Re: GRAVE bug in j2re1.4 packages
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:38:46AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2003 10:30, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I guess there are too alternatives here:
> >
> > a) don't include kerbero stuff and depend on the respectives debian
> > packages.
> >
> > b) include the alternatives but with a lower priority
> >
> > I'm inclined towards a) as I believe the less we rely on external
> > binaries the better. Does anybody disagree?
> I wouldn't mind having alternatives if the krb5-user package USED them!
> :)
>
> I would say leave the binaries in /usr/bin alone and let people use
> the ones in /usr/lib/j2se as needed. (option a)
Done. I've simply not included those binaries since they were described
as optional in the README.
Check the new revision from
http://jrfonseca.dyndns.org/debian/
and tell me if everything is as you expect.
Jose Fonseca
Reply to: