Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies
Hello
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[🔎] 20030226144746.GA14788@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
> Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >Well there seems to be some vauge statements in the policy. I assumed
> >that blackdown should present both java1-runtime _and_ java2-runtime
> >becuse it can fulfill both runtime requirements (in reasonable way).
> >
> >What do people on the debian java list think about this?
>
> That seems right to me. Note that some packages which provide
> java2-runtime might not provide java1-runtime, particularly if
> they don't support the deprecated methods...
Do I have to make this more clear in the policy?
Should I make better recommendation when to provide what, or should
we trust peoples common sense?
Regards,
// Ola
> - Alex
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: