Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies
reassign 182466 java-common
thanks
Hi
Well there seems to be some vauge statements in the policy. I assumed
that blackdown should present both java1-runtime _and_ java2-runtime
becuse it can fulfill both runtime requirements (in reasonable way).
What do people on the debian java list think about this?
Regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:07:16PM +0200, Heikki Kantola wrote:
> Package: libbatik-java
> Version: 1.5beta2-4 (not installed)
> Severity: normal
>
> Currently libbatik-java seems to depend on "kaffe|java1-runtime",
> thus if the Blackdown Java2 packages (yes, outside Debian archives)
> are present APT happily wants to install also kaffe as those packages
> don't provide "java1-runtime" (but "java2-runtime" they provide).
> Also from <URL:http://xml.apache.org/batik/install.html> I gather that
> Batik needs JVM compatible with Java 1.3 or newer to run, thus the
> "java1-runtime" propably should be changed into "java2-runtime" as I
> cannot think any Java 1.3 compatible JVM, which would not go under
> Java2-label.
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Architecture: i386
> Kernel: Linux nimbocumulus 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 #2 Thu Jun 13 22:16:09 EEST 2002 i686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI
>
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: