[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updated java policy



On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:17:53PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Hmm?  I thought we were allowing the choice of (1) splitting *.class and JNI 
> libraries into -java and -jni packages, or (2) bundling them all into a 
> single arch-dependent -java package when the package is so small that the 
> split appears to be more hassle than it's worth.

That is why there is a should in there. If you have suggestions on how
to write it better I appriciate such wishlist bugs. :)

Regards

// Ola

> The fragment of policy below seems to insist on (1) only.
> 
> >     <para>
> >       If the Java code depends on code written in a "native" language,
> >       for example Java Native Interface code, the compiled native code
> >       &should; be shipped in a separate architecture-specific package.
> >       The package containing Java bytecode should depend on this
> >       package.
> >     </para>
> 
> Perhaps I missed part of the thread there?
> 
> Ben.
> 
> - -- 
> 
> Ben Burton
> benb@acm.org  |  bab@debian.org
> Public Key: finger bab@db.debian.org
> 
> Questions are never indiscreet. Answers sometimes are.
> 	- Oscar Wilde
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE9kXE1MQNuxza4YcERAstJAJ4lNIJevubKClBBNc+ILHwsM+QblACfehZB
> nwl/YbvZgx/6zNatp6DrrCw=
> =UsXY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: