Re: Packaging a library, with JNI and javadocs
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:15:13PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > I'm in favor of using the -java for JNI + supporting java classes.
> > After all, it's still a Java library - it's just architecture
> > dependant. Instead of using -jni, I vote the package be built
> > architecture dependant. eg. as opposed to _all.deb it's a _i386.deb.
>
> I second this. It should be put in the Java policy this way.
>
> There has been a discussion about native-compiled Java code using
> gcj on this list some month ago but no consensus was reached. Maybe
> this could be resolved together with the JNI matter now?
They seem very similar so yes it should be resolved. :)
Regards.
// Ola
> Greetings,
> Stefan Gybas
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: