Re: Packaging a library, with JNI and javadocs
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I'm in favor of using the -java for JNI + supporting java classes.
> After all, it's still a Java library - it's just architecture
> dependant. Instead of using -jni, I vote the package be built
> architecture dependant. eg. as opposed to _all.deb it's a _i386.deb.
I second this. It should be put in the Java policy this way.
There has been a discussion about native-compiled Java code using
gcj on this list some month ago but no consensus was reached. Maybe
this could be resolved together with the JNI matter now?
Greetings,
Stefan Gybas
Reply to: