Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 05:08, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Josh Huber writes:
> > Rick Lutowski <rick@jreality.com> writes:
>
> >> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> >> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> >> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> >> 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
> >
> > And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is much nicer
> > without java & flash.
>
> You prefer VBscript and ActiveX controls then? That's what
> you encourage. Java must run everywhere, else we have no
> argument against 100% Microsoft solutions.
>
> What is so bad about Java and Flash anyway?
They're not bad per se, but IME they're mostly good for complementary
stuff and sites which require them are simply broken IMHO
('accessibility' comes to mind).
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: