[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation



On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 10:33:50PM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Guillaume Rousse <rousse@ccr.jussieu.fr> writes:
> > - which name to use for javadoc package ?
> > debian use -doc for their standard documentation package, so -javadoc would 
> > be consistent
> > jpackage use -manual, so -javadoc would be less consistent (unless we switch 
> > to -doc also, of course)
> 
>   -doc feels good. It's shorter than javadoc too ;-).

But if we want to distinguish between doc and javadoc on the filesystem
level I think it is good to separate it on the package level too.

I vote for -javadoc.

Regards,

// Ola

> -- 
> Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
> Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian!
> If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpjBug3jQ3Yk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: