> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) > should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line incompatibility, etc). Ben. -- Ben Burton benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/ Public Key: finger bab@debian.org He hasn't an enemy in the world, and none of his friends like him. - Oscar Wilde