Re: Large-scale java policy violations
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:13:30PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > Two packages are probably better. One junit for the program
> > which depends on libjunit-java which contains the jar.
>
> Please no! Do you want to put each single file in its own Debian
> package? In your suggstion the junit package would just contain the
> shell script /usr/bin/junit and /usr/bin/junit would just contain
> /usr/share/java/junit.jar if you put the API docs in another package.
>
> Please keep the name junit. It's an application so it should be named
> like one.
But isn't junit primary a testing _framework_? But I got your point.
The documentation is quite big though.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: