[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Large-scale java policy violations



On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:00, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:32:51AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Ok. Lets standardize on the libfoo[version]-java names.
> 
> I really like to comment that i do not think we should punish those
> who complied to the current Java policy, and use
> lib-foo[version]-java instead...

Of course we should not punish anyone, especially not the ones that
made the current policy. :)

But personally I like libfoo[version]-java better because it is
more similar to the libfoo packages (for C). This is a tiny issue though
so I let other people decide. So what do you people think?

Regards,

// Ola

> Egon
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: