[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?



On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:13:35PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
> 
> > > 	Do you mean that the java2-virtual-machine-dummy package should also
> > > 	provide java-virtual-machine ?
> > 
> > Well, that too, but that's not what I meant. :)
> > 
> > No, I mean for instance kaffe should provide java-virtual-machine, but 
> > j2sdk1.3 should provide both java-virtual-machine and java2-virtual-machine.

Ok this shounds good, but some things before I'll add it to the
policy.

* Should we have a java2-compiler too?
* The java-virtual-machine should only be provided by the java2 virtual
  machine if it is (completely?) backwards compatible.
* Should we have a java1-virtual-machine?


Well that is just some questions. I'll add it to the (proposed-)policy when I
got some consensus about it and when I have had the time to fiddle
with the cvs archive for the policy. I have not yet updated it since I
took over the maintenance. :)

Regards,

// Ola

> 	*nod*. I agree.
> 
> > This at least means that even though you don't have dependencies for virtual 
> > packages, you still have a way of requiring Java2.  But OTOH j2sdk1.3 will 
> > still satisfy the less stringent requirement of "any java", i.e. 
> > java-virtual-machine.
> 
> 	Yep. We're on the same level here.
> 
> 	Ok, so what happens now ? This kind of proposal is something that
> 	should really be added to the java-policy as it concerns the base
> 	components of a java system. How does this happen (assuming it's
> 	accepted) ?
> 
> 	Perhaps we should wait a few days to see if any others have
> 	comments/thoughts they would like to add, as I'm more than interested
> 	in hearing any other proposals, comments, etc.
> 	
> 	If there are no major hassles, then mid next week I'll send in a more
> 	formal proposal for a java2-virtual-machine concept, which can be
> 	further discussed if needed. ITP's, etc, could then follow.
> 
> 	How does that sound ?
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 
> 	Marcus
> 
> -- 
>         .....
>      ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
>     ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
>     $:         $$$$:   Open Software Associates GmbH
>      $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
>      ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
>        '     /( &&&
>            \_&&&&'     Email : Marcus.Crafter@osa.de
>           &&&&.        Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
>     &&&&&&&:
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: