On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:41:55 +0100, Paolo Sala wrote:
> Ferdinando scrisse in data 14/01/2011 14:36:
> > P.S.: Comunque guerra persa 'non spezzare i thread', usare un MUA
> > decente che non introduca Re: R: Re...',
>
> Veramente ho cercato in rete ma non ho trovato documenti ufficiali che
> dicano che nelle risposte bisogna anteporre RE: e non R:... ma forse non
> ho cercato bene. Se lo trovi lo posti in lista?
RFC 8222:
The "Subject:" field is the most common and contains a short string
identifying the topic of the message. When used in a reply, the field body
MAY start with the string "Re: " (from the Latin "res", in the matter of)
followed by the contents of the "Subject:" field body of the original
message. If this is done, only one instance of the literal string "Re: "
ought to be used since use of other strings or more than one instance can
lead to undesirable consequences.
Dice MAY, ma parla anche solamente di "Re:".
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html
Ciao,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature