Re: Java [_newbie_]
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:27:05PM +0100, FB wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:21:48AM +0100, paolo massei wrote:
> >
> > Quello che segue e' il responso di 'apt-get install jdk* ' sul mio
> > sistema puro-potato, dopo avere aggiornato i database dei pacchetti a
> > potato2.2r2:
> >
> > ProteoTien:/home/paolo# apt-get install jdk*
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > Note, selecting jdk1.1 instead of jdk1.1-runtime
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > bsh emacs20 emacsen-common freetds-jdbc ibm-jdk1.1-installer java-common jde jdk1.1 jdk1.1-dev
> > jdk1.1-native jdk1.1-native-dev jdresolve libnet-dns-perl libpm3 libpm3-extra netobjd xjdic
> >
> > Need to get 25.5MB of archives. After unpacking 70.0MB will be used.
> >
CUT CUT
>
> A questo punto mi chiedo se la 'unstable' contiene il JDK 1.2 ( o Java2,
> per dirla con Sun ), o addirittura jdk 1.3 ...
>
>
pinguino:/home/dario# apt-get install jdk*
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Note, selecting jdk1.1 instead of jdk1.1-runtime
The following extra packages will be installed:
bsh emacs20 freetds-jdbc jde jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native-dev jdresolve libpm3
libpm3-extra netobjd xjdic
sulla unstable ...... direi che non e' cambiato molto (i pacchetti che mancano dalla lista e'
perche' li ho gia' installati)
Saluti
--
DarioB (on irc dariondol)
S.A. Labinfo - Facolta' di Economia - Universita' degli Studi BO
Segretario ERLUG
http://erlug.linux.it
Reply to: