[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mouse intellimouse



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

tom scripsit:
>Ho un mouse "intellimouse microsoft" la cui rotellina,per scorrere le =
pagine,non riesco a farla funzionare con xfrre86
>dell'ultima versione stabile di debian:qualcuno potrebbe dirmi come fa=
re?
>GRAZIE.

Ho (quasi) lo stesso mouse e forse posso aiutarti... mi serve solo
un'informazione: hai gpm? (gpm =E8 il pacchetto che permette di utiliza=
re il
mouse nelle console, senza X).

In ogni caso, ecco la sezione Pointer del mio XF86Config:


# *********************************************************************=
*
# Pointer section
# *********************************************************************=
*

Section "Pointer"
    Protocol    "imps/2"
    Device "/dev/psaux"
#Wheel mouse
    Resolution 100
    Buttons 6
    ZAxisMapping 4 5

# When using XQUEUE, comment out the above two lines, and uncomment
# the following line.

#    Protocol=09"Xqueue"

# Baudrate and SampleRate are only for some Logitech mice
# or for the AceCad tablets which require 9600 baud

#    BaudRate=099600
#    SampleRate=09150

# Emulate3Buttons is an option for 2-button Microsoft mice
# Emulate3Timeout is the timeout in milliseconds (default is 50ms)

#    Emulate3Buttons
#    Emulate3Timeout    50

# ChordMiddle is an option for some 3-button Logitech mice

#    ChordMiddle

EndSection

- --=20
Leo TheHobbit=20
IRCnet #leiene
ICQ 56656060

- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GED/CS d? s-:+>-: a C+++ U+++ L++(+++)>++++ P+++>+++++ E+(++)=20
W++ N+ K? o? !w O? M V--- PS+++ PE-- Y+ GPG+ t++ 5? X- R+ tv+=20
b++++ D? DI? G e(++++)* h(+) r--(---) y(+)-->+++*
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www=
.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE5usTUv9iOG/S6owkRAgj9AJ9tCVF6vORASXiEH4SmWhrm0HRtzgCeNk7s
m3F7HzDo/18diWEPMrIxFMU=3D
=3D+9OR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: