Am 2007-03-20 14:16:32, schrieb Michael Loftis: > --On March 20, 2007 4:37:25 PM +0100 Cherubini Enrico <kevin@bestkevin.com> > > Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote: > >the bottleneck is the hardware, a dual xeon 3.20GHz with 2GB of ram, that, > >is pretty high on load in the antivir/antispam server (of course). > > I'd ascertain what kind of load. If it's I/O, NFS will likely make it > worse since NFS increases latency to disk by huge amounts. Also I've had > some serious issues with the 2.6 NFS server and have stayed on 2.4 for our > NFS server because of this. > > A machine that size should be able to handle a LOT of scanning. 2Gb of ram > though is really anemic for high mail volumes with AV/AS. I'd suggest 4Gb > or 8Gb. Run vmstat and watch it, see if you're swapping, see how much > cache you're using. I have only AMD Opteron 256 with 8 GByte each and I have some times trouble with my InBound "courier-mta-ss"> and VIRUS/SPAM filtering. I like to setup the InBound MTA for SMTP-Level based filtering which drop already 80% of the SPAM and then use an external server for the rest of VIRUS/SPAM filtering. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature