RE: NEVER USE SORBS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:baloo@ursine.ca]
> Sent: 27 July 2006 20:28
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: NEVER USE SORBS
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:40, James Stevenson wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shane Chrisp [mailto:shane@2000cn.com.au]
> > > Sent: 27 July 2006 15:46
> > > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> > > Subject: Re: NEVER USE SORBS
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 23:42 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > > > btw a mail server on ADSL is not so much different to one on ISDN,
> but
> > >
> > > ADSL
> > >
> > > > is available with much faster speeds.
> > >
> > > Except that ISDN is a guaranteed service and ADSL is a best effort.
> >
> > That's not actually true. ADSL Can be as guaranteed as ISDN.
>
> Not according to phone company documentation. ISDN gaurantees a
> throughput,
> ADSL is leftover bandwidth after all the ISDN and T* and OC* customers are
> done with it.
That's how your provider may handle it. But it is possible to get a closed
ADSL loop which give you 100% of the bandwidtht hats all your between
toplaces. Point to multiple point sites can also be done in the UK.
What your providers provide is not what the technologies provide.
Reply to: