Re: NEVER USE SORBS
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:29:38PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 19:53, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:30:49AM +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote:
> > > > > None of these are true (at least no one making these claims has
> > > > > bothered to provide evidence).
> > > >
> > > > I'm under NDA about that situation still. Don't construe being
> > > > legally unable to share as a lack of evidence.
> > >
> > > This only looks like another way of saying I dont have any evidence to
> > > offer so im gonna give another bullshit story.
> >
> > it is. God spoke to me and told me it was, and so did the aliens.
> > unfortunately, i'm under an NDA and can't provide any proof of these
> > conversations. but they happened. really and truly they did.
>
> Let's keep the fagatronics to a minimum, Sanders.
how odd. you must really be an american, despite the domain name...and
a particularly slow-witted one at that. canadians can usually detect
sarcasm. even americans can usually detect it when it's laid on with a
sledgehammer as above.
oh, you can take your juvenile homophobic insults and shove them up your
arse. i'm not queer myself but i have no problem with anyone who is. i'm
also long out of high school so calling me a fag or implying that i am
one doesn't bother me in the slightest. i do, however, find high-school
level insults to be slightly annoying in that they lower the tone of the
list. if you're going to try and insult someone, at least make it an
insult worth the time it takes to read it.
run along now. it must be near your bed time.
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
Reply to: