On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:24:09PM +0300, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:13:35AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > I run a mailserver, which has a static allocation. Reverse DNS matches > > forward DNS. However, TTL was lowered on the records so we could move > > various servers to a new range. We then found that the entire /24 was > > blocked as being 'dynamic', despite the range being clearly PI space. > > What was the cause of the listing? > We don't know. We asked, and was pointed at http://www.nl.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml > Once you have moved around the servers why not raise the TTL so that you can > get unlisted (assuming you have already dealt with the cause of the listing)? > We had no idea why it was listed. The TTL was indeed raised, but it still took three months to get unlisted. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature