On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:13:35AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:23:34PM +0300, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: > > > > and your ISP complies with all the other rules > > > > that SORBS likes to enforce then you could possibly get this > > > > decision reversed. > > > The rules are ridiculous and arbitrary. > > > > They are arbitrary, but they catch spam very well and there are practically > > no false positives (not counting people who really should be using > > smarthosts). > > > > I object to the "practically no false positives (not counting people who > really should be using smarthosts)". > > I run a mailserver, which has a static allocation. Reverse DNS matches > forward DNS. However, TTL was lowered on the records so we could move > various servers to a new range. We then found that the entire /24 was > blocked as being 'dynamic', despite the range being clearly PI space. > > Should I be using a smart host in this instance? The only people who "should be using smarthosts" are people on dialup or other intermittently-connected links... You have my sympathy. -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature