Re: Muilt-home routing question?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
So, what happens if you try to define another route by hand, it won't
take it because there is already a route set?
While working with Cisco routers and Linux servers I have never run into
the problem of wondering why Linux doesn't take two default routes and
still work. You can't have two, it's not possible. It's like driving
down the freeway, except you want to take two exits at once, it's just
not going to happen.
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Greg Ryman <gregr@candylogic.com> [2006.07.07.2330 +0200]:
>> actually it's a routing issue, and not a problem in linux. show me
>> another os that you can plug into two different networks on the same nic
>> and get evenly balanced traffic accross both connections.
>
> I am not asking for this, I know this is not easy to accomplish. Or
> at least not unless you dig iproute.
>
> What I want is that it takes *either* of the routes consistently
> ("the first"), instead of just not working.
>
- --
Greg Ryman
Network Engineering Supervisor
Candylogic, LLC.
gregr@candylogic.com
949-916-4444 x.203
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFErtuQ3nq9k6G+PM0RAgmkAJ4kD5genhuVTozaMr3rg/lR+lZ+dgCfVFu0
+D1Y+/aclrcIOa9JPBKX2DM=
=BGDS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: