Re: load balancing

To: Eduard Ballester <ballester@ipsistemas.com>, debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: load balancing
From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:31:52 +0100
Message-id: <200303111331.52729.russell@coker.com.au>
Reply-to: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
In-reply-to: <3E6DCDDA.9090204@ipsistemas.com>
References: <1047332485.1568.30.camel@oficina4> <200303111111.27319.russell@coker.com.au> <3E6DCDDA.9090204@ipsistemas.com>

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:51, Eduard Ballester wrote:
> > For load balancing create several POP and IMAP proxies with an IPVS load
> > balancer in front.  Use Perdition on the POP and IMAP proxies to direct
> > the connection to the correct back-end server that has the mail.
>
> I had used Perdition+LDAP and it works fine!!!
>
> My question:
> do you know any software like Perdition but for FTP service?

Ask Horms about it.

FTP with only passive support is a simple enough protocol, probably an hour of 
coding could add it to Perdition.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to:

References:
- load balancing
  - From: danilo lujambio <danilo@tau.org.ar>
- Re: load balancing
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: load balancing
  - From: Eduard Ballester <ballester@ipsistemas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: load balancing
Next by Date: Re: load balancing
Previous by thread: Re: load balancing
Next by thread: Re: load balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread