Re: woody - bind - hint or forwarders
- To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: woody - bind - hint or forwarders
- From: Rcca <rcca@laurel.hu>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 14:26:21 +0100
- Message-id: <308LJWS6Z74878JDQPNB60408QL2.3e42627d@robi_nt>
- In-reply-to: <00cf01c2cd31$f8586770$1442a8c0@marco>
Use the "forward first " statement
Bind will ask the nearest name-servers ( in the "forwarders" statement) to resolve the names.
The ISP-s name server may have more resolved requests than your.
If the forwarder hasn't the address your server will resolve it.
It works well by us for years.
R.
Idézve: Dátum: 2003/2/5 17:16:27. Feladó: "Marco Kammerer" <m.kammerer_SL@gmx.at>.
>
>
> Feladó: "Marco Kammerer" <m.kammerer_SL@gmx.at>
>
> Címzett:<debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
> Tárgy: woody - bind - hint or forwarders
> Dátum: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:16:27 +0100
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> is it better to use forwarders or to use hint files in the named.conf file?
>
> recently i uses forwarders and hintfiles like every tutorial out there
> teaches you but some stupid bug in bind tells me that it bind is not able to
> resolf one if the root servers and therefor the hole server dies.
>
> that "feature" is really great :-(
>
> so i found out that you either use the hintfiles or forwarders but not both
> together.
>
> what is aour opininion?
>
> tell me what you use or you prefere ....
>
> marco
>
>
>
Reply to: