Re: Spam
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:27, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tim Haynes <debian@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk> [2002.01.16.2349
+0100]:
> > > two objections:
> > >
> > > (a) load
> >
> > Not a noticeable change on here.
>
> you don't process 100 mails/minute.
As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (most users aren't changing IP
addresses that often so users == IP addresses) a bind instance on localhost
should do pretty well at caching the RBL entries.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>