[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Divide a network



Just bind x.x.x.200/29 to the eth0 interface of the .206 box, and
x.x.x.192/29 to the eth0 interface of the .194 box, then use a ppp
link between .206 and 194, bind x.x.x.192/29 to ppp0 of .206, and
x.x.x.200/29 to ppp0 of .194, here a table:

      .206              .194
eth0  x.x.x.200/29      x.x.x.192/29
ppp0  x.x.x.192/29      x.x.x.200/29

oh, and don't forget to set the default gw correct

i might have made some errors here, but you got the idea

On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 05:15:40PM +0200, RJ wrote:
> How to divide the network a.b.c.192/28 into two independent networks to
> pass the second network a.b.c.200/29 via Linux routers and PPP?
> 
>             old network      new networks
>            255.255.255.240  255.255.255.248
> a.b.c.192  newtork0         subnetwork1
> a.b.c.193  IP01             IP1
...
> a.b.c.198  IP06             IP6
> a.b.c.199  IP07             broadcast1
> a.b.c.200  IP08             subnetwork2
> a.b.c.201  IP09             IP1
...
> a.b.c.206  IP14             IP6
> a.b.c.207  broadcast0       broadcast2
> 
> ROUTER a.b.c.193
>    |
>  +-+-+              +-----+
>  |   +-- a.b.c.194--+LINUX+
>  |   +-- a.b.c.195  +--+--+
>  |HUB+-- a.b.c.196     |PPP
>  |   +-- ...        +--+--+
>  |   +-- a.b.c.206  |LINUX|
           ^^^^^^^^^
           this shouldn't be on that hub i suppose, only connected
           through the other linux box and ppp
>  +---+              +--+--+
>                        |
>                      +-+-+
>          a.b.c.209 --+   |
>          a.b.c.210 --+   |
>          a.b.c.211 --+HUB|
>          ...       --+   |
>          a.b.c.206 --+   |
>                      +---+
-- 
,-------------------------------------------.
> Name:           Alson van der Meulen      <
> Personal:       alson@linuxfreak.nl       <
> School:       alson@gymnasiumleiden.nl    <
`-------------------------------------------'
Say, What does "Superblock Error" mean, anyhow?
---------------------------------------------



Reply to: