Hi all,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> writes:
> > A further consideration is whether Wide DHCpv6 is maintained upstream - it
> > appears not to be.
>
> That's my impression as well. There doesn't seem to be any activity at
> all from the upstream maintainer(s).
>
> The Debian maintainer is doing a great job, but the main problem with
> Wide DHCPv6 is the lack of an upstream. Kind of begs for someone to
> just take it...
Just for the record, wide-dhcpv6 upstream has not been responsive at all for the
last couple of years. I would have taken the project over if I had time to do
so. Feel free to submit patches to the Debian BTS. I will gladly integrate
them in the Debian package and also forward them upstream, just in case.
Also, if anyone is willing to help on the Debian packaging, I am open to any
proposal. I have little time to work on this right now. It would definitely
benefit from more people getting involved. It is hosted on one of my own
servers but I would probably move that to git.debian.org if someone stepped up.
Cheers,
--
Jeremie
/* Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this!
Doctor: Well, then don't do it. */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature