Re: Re-prioritizing 6to4 over v4 addresses
Bernhard Schmidt wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 19:45:21 +0000):
> > I tried uncommenting all the "label" lines and reordering the
> > "values" to ensure that "2002::/16" got a higher value than
> > "::ffff:0:0/96"; and I tried uncommenting all the "precedence"
> > lines and reordering the "values" (but "2002::/16" already had
> > a higher value than "::ffff:0:0/96" anyway); ...
..
> I think the best way is just to use the default configuration, then drop
> the 2002::/16 block completely.
Thanks for the suggestion. Tried that (with both "label" and
"precedence"), but I can't see a difference. strace shows that
"gai.conf" does get read. Well, I'll keep poking around...
Regards, Marcus
--
Marcus C. Gottwald · <mcg@cheers.de> · https://cheers.de
Reply to: