Re: why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1

To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: Satyanarayana Reddy M <satyanarayanam@tataelxsi.co.in>, debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:48:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070502104807.GA25594@nic.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4638395F.8030804@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
References: <[🔎] 000001c78c81$800109d0$3f19320a@telxsi.com> <[🔎] 4638395F.8030804@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:10:23AM +0100,
 Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote 
 a message of 52 lines which said:

> See the RFC's 

RFC 3682

Reply to:

References:
- why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1
  - From: Satyanarayana Reddy M <satyanarayanam@tataelxsi.co.in>
- Re: why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1
  - From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>

Prev by Date: Re: why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1
Next by Date: The software also can look directly into the home network to run diagnostics and automatic fixes.
Previous by thread: Re: why we using hoplimit for ND -255 /why not 1
Next by thread: The software also can look directly into the home network to run diagnostics and automatic fixes.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread