Re: Routing with 6to4 *and* a tunnel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:
>> Yes, that's right. If you can't get native IPv6, 6to4 is better
>> than tunnels.
Marc> According to my ISP, the stall for IPv6 in the US is ARIN.
Marc> They are asking something like US$20G for an allocation--per
Marc> year. The ISP owner tells me that there just isn't sufficient
AFAIK, that's not correct. It was true for awhile, 3-4 years ago.
If you currently pay ARIN for IPv4 space, they will give you IPv6
space for free. A lot of organizations, however, do not get IPv4 from
ARIN, but rather from their upstream.
- --
] Michael Richardson Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON | firewalls [
] mcr @ xelerance.com Now doing IPsec training, see |net architect[
] http://www.sandelman.ca/mcr/ www.xelerance.com/training/ |device driver[
] I'm a dad: http://www.sandelman.ca/lrmr/ [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBQsLjXYqHRg3pndX9AQFSbAP/VrE3l+TNP9RqSeHoxD3talTwmxlJbkG3
TQ8N5EetJC677KcDLbDFgieVl2Yye8chyqO2XMYTObvZT0+mxZvNAD+08my547Fz
Ivwh4DD93MeUeFJwZC0UqXw/h5gaAUOA0PxE4e5DRnHz6nfKudvSiNRX02zWzFp9
vqC7Q4B0dcQ=
=AnZ1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: