RE: ipv6 routing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Noodles [mailto:noodles@nzwireless.org] wrote:
> This probably doesn't give you any more information though
>
> I forgot to mention, I'm running debian 3 woody, kernel is 2.4.18-586
>
> I'll try changing it to /64, but my tunnel provider said to use /62
Maybe your 'tunnel provider' routed a /62 (odd number) to the tunnel.
In any case a link should get a /64, a tunnel is a link...
And they should be delegating /48's to endsites where there is
a probability that there will be more than 1 link.
Greets,
Jeroen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jeroen@unfix.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 4 October 2003 10:52 p.m.
> To: 'Noodles'; debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: ipv6 routing
>
> Noodles [mailto:noodles@nzwireless.org] wrote:
>
> > This is my lan interface:
> >
> > eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:0B:DC:6B
> > inet addr:192.168.0.254 Bcast:192.168.0.255
> > Mask:255.255.255.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::205:1cff:fe0b:dc6b/10 Scope:Link
> > inet6 addr: 2001:c78:2003:e008::2/62 Scope:Global
>
> That should be a /64.
>
> Secondly use traceroute6's and tcpdump's to see what errors
> you really are getting back because "it doesn't work" doesn't
> give any information whatsoever
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / jeroen@unfix.org / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP4RfAimqKFIzPnwjEQK1SQCeIwrszul1PqZ1NbTwetzaHBPQPwcAoIqw
manasnAfhO1YvE6hufqupzG6
=Sexn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: