Re: IPv6 packages
In article <[🔎] 20020204003020.GA7744@wonderland.linux.it> (at Mon, 4 Feb 2002 01:30:20 +0100), "Marco d'Itri" <md@Linux.IT> says:
> On Feb 03, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net> wrote:
>
> >Should we support temporary ip6.int and ip6.arpa (that anyway is NOT working
> >in the libc6 code) or should we just leave the code that comes from the
> >upstream (ip6.arpa)?????
> If a choice has to be made, the I'd say we MUST choose ip6.int for woody.
query ip6.arpa, then ip6.int.; both using nibble format.
we may need "no-ip6-arpa" resolver option.
--yoshfuji
Reply to: