Re: IPv6 packages
Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> Remco van de Meent <remco@vandemeent.net> writes:
>
> > A6 is marked historic now, I believe. ip6.int is deprecated for 'new
> > imlementations'. ip6.arpa is now best current practice, I seem to
> > remember (rfc3152).
>
> Experimental, not historic I think.
>
> draft-ietf-dnsext-ipv6-addresses-00.txt is trying to make RFCs 2874
> and 2673 experimental. Currently both AAAA[RFC1886] and A6[RFC2874]
> are still proposed standards. Is that what you are referring to?
Guess I'm ahead of time :) Apparently it's not in de rfc document
series yet.
draft-ietf-dnsext-aaaa-a6-01 proposes the move to historic. We'll see
what happens. But let's for all sake not redo the A6/AAAA discussion
once again...
Regarding ip6.arpa vs. ip6.int, rfc3152 is very clear about this.
regards,
Remco.
--
:: remco@vandemeent.net
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
Reply to: