Re: IPv6 packages
On Feb 03, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net> wrote:
>From direct experience A6 has not real big advantages against AAAA but
>ip6.arpa is much more readable than ip6.int entries.
>
>Don't forget the famous: the administrator wants things easy to maintain
>because he's lazy ;)
A6 records and bitlabel delegations are much harder to configure and
deploy, so this is an argument in favour of nibble-based reverse
mapping.
Anyway, this is not the point. My point is that ip6.arpa is not going
to be deployed soon by most networks (the 6bone space has not been
delegated yet!), so removing ip6.int support is simply moronic.
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to: