On Feb 03, Heikki Vatiainen <hessu@cs.tut.fi> wrote: >Why did you add A6 into discussion about how to do *reverse* >resolution? E.g. RFC 3152 "Delegation of IP6.ARPA" just says that do >not use ip6.int., use ip6.arpa. There is nothing in ip6.arpa. that >forces us to use DNAME instead of nibble format. I mistakenly understood bitlabel reverse mapping was introduced. Adding support for ip6.arpa is a good thing, but removing ip6.int support is still evil. -- ciao, Marco