Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:05:38PM -0300, horape@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar wrote:
> ?Hola!
>
> I've sent to the ipngwg and ngtrans mailing lists the following, based
> on the discussions we've had here some months ago. Please if you have
> any comments participate on the discussions in the lists mentioned
> before.
>
> The objective is allowing Linux to be RFC compliant and we being able
> to work independently of the AF at the same.
Have you had any interesting responses? Having written some code i now
see the problems you are referring to and so would be interested to see
this issue fixed.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: