Re: default routes
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:10:15AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > The reason for using 2000::0/3 instead of default is not, as decribed above,
> > but the problem was with nettools (like route) unable to understand the
> > "default" value.
> It's not. On Linux as ipv6 router (forwarding enabled) you need to set real routes.
> (In Alexey words: ,,real routers have real routes''). On host you can use default route.
> I'm for example using it withour any problems.
Ah yes, I remember that quote.
OK, so what defines a router? Is it just something with more than one
interface? ip forwarding turned on?
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: