Re: IPv6 adoption
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, William F. Maton wrote:
>
> > > CRC.ca is *supposed* to have a mirror on their IPv6 drop but its IPv6
> > > presence doesn't seem to be super stable yet :|
> >
> > Hooo haaaa! We just upgraded to a newer Cisco IOS, which caused us some
> > BGP+ grief. Right now things seem genki (OK). In fact, ftp.ipv6.crc.ca
> > is multihomed:
>
> Hmm
>
> PING 3FFE:3700:1F00:FC83:0:0:0:2(3ffe:3700:1f00:fc83::2) 56 data bytes
> >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
> >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
> >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
> >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
>
> The 2001 IP works fine..
Looks like a routing problem somewhere.
> > Via CA*Net 3, directly by tunnel to the 6Tap in Chicago and via a tunnel
> > to Qwest. So what's the dark lining in this silver cloud? You can't
>
> Are one of those two groups willing to give permanent tunnels to smaller
> organizations like us?
Qwest is looking actually make IPv6 tunnel services a commercial offering
by the end of the year. 6Tap *may* do it for free though.
> > connect via FTP using IPv6! You need to use augustus.dgim.crc.ca for
> > that, and I'm running that machine with Solaris 8. The only reason? The
> > lack of a reliable port of *any* FTP daemon (with features like wu-ftpd)
>
> I've been using openbsd ftpd (the linux port) it seems to work well
> enough, but I am not doing any serious serving with it.
OK. I've got lot's of classes and users on this system....Maybe I'll try
it.
>
> Jason
>
wfms
Reply to: