Re: IPv6 adoption
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, William F. Maton wrote:
> > CRC.ca is *supposed* to have a mirror on their IPv6 drop but its IPv6
> > presence doesn't seem to be super stable yet :|
>
> Hooo haaaa! We just upgraded to a newer Cisco IOS, which caused us some
> BGP+ grief. Right now things seem genki (OK). In fact, ftp.ipv6.crc.ca
> is multihomed:
Hmm
PING 3FFE:3700:1F00:FC83:0:0:0:2(3ffe:3700:1f00:fc83::2) 56 data bytes
>From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
>From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
>From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
>From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
The 2001 IP works fine..
> Via CA*Net 3, directly by tunnel to the 6Tap in Chicago and via a tunnel
> to Qwest. So what's the dark lining in this silver cloud? You can't
Are one of those two groups willing to give permanent tunnels to smaller
organizations like us?
> connect via FTP using IPv6! You need to use augustus.dgim.crc.ca for
> that, and I'm running that machine with Solaris 8. The only reason? The
> lack of a reliable port of *any* FTP daemon (with features like wu-ftpd)
I've been using openbsd ftpd (the linux port) it seems to work well
enough, but I am not doing any serious serving with it.
Jason
Reply to: