[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS



Processing control commands:

> clone -1 -2
Bug #1060951 [src:gobject-introspection] Build regression in multiarch g-ir-scanner
Bug 1060951 cloned as bug 1071116
> retitle -1 gobject-introspection: multiarch g-ir-scanner doesn't find recursive library dependencies
Bug #1060951 [src:gobject-introspection] Build regression in multiarch g-ir-scanner
Changed Bug title to 'gobject-introspection: multiarch g-ir-scanner doesn't find recursive library dependencies' from 'Build regression in multiarch g-ir-scanner'.
> retitle -2 libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS
Bug #1071116 [src:gobject-introspection] Build regression in multiarch g-ir-scanner
Changed Bug title to 'libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS' from 'Build regression in multiarch g-ir-scanner'.
> reassign -2 libkkc 0.3.5-8
Bug #1071116 [src:gobject-introspection] libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gobject-introspection' to 'libkkc'.
No longer marked as found in versions gobject-introspection/1.78.1-17 and gobject-introspection/1.78.1-15.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1071116 to the same values previously set
Bug #1071116 [libkkc] libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS
There is no source info for the package 'libkkc' at version '0.3.5-8' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.3.5-8'
Marked as found in versions 0.3.5-8.
> tags -2 + upstream
Bug #1071116 [libkkc] libkkc: likely shouldn't add recursive dependencies to Marisa_gir_SCANNERFLAGS
Added tag(s) upstream.

-- 
1060951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060951
1071116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: