[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED



I double checked ...

If I use apt-get source fcitx-sunpinyin, I get different tarball comes
with size 42992.

Can you fix VCS to hold pristine-tar with 42992 size one.

Then I will do gbp buildpackage.

Osamu

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:16:15AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> 
> My downloaded fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2.orig.tar.xz had 42984
> I used 
>  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx-sunpinyin/fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2-2.dsc
> 
> Your git repo has the same tarball.
> 
> Maybe original upload had some issue.  Any thought?
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
> 
> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:57:48 +0000
> From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
> To: Boyuan Yang <073plan@gmail.com>, Debian Input Method Team <debian-input-method@lists.debian.org>, osamu@debian.org
> Subject: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
> 
> 
> 
> fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2.orig.tar.xz:
> According to the control file the size hash should be 42984,
> but fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2.orig.tar.xz has 42992.
> 
> If you did not include fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.2.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a different version
> might already be known to the archive software.
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 


Reply to: