Re: Bug#502422: openoffice.org_1:3.0.0-2(ia64/experimental): UNO calling Java method initialize: java.lang.StackOverflowError
tag 502422 + help
thanks
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of openoffice.org_1:3.0.0-2 on alkman.ayous.org by sbuild/ia64 98-farm
[...]
> > -env:URE_INTERNAL_JAVA_DIR=file:///build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m9/solver/300/unxlnga.pro/bin
> > file:///build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m9/testtools/source/bridgetest/../../unxlnga.pro/class/testComponent.jar
> > register component 'file:///build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m9/testtools/source/bridgetest/../../unxlnga.pro/class/testComponent.jar' in registry
> > +'../../unxlnga.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' failed!
> > error (RuntimeException): [jni_uno bridge error] UNO calling Java method initialize: java.lang.StackOverflowError
> > using loader com.sun.star.loader.Java2
> > dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlnga.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb'
> > dmake: '../../unxlnga.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' removed.
> >
> > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m9/testtools/source/bridgetest
> > rmdir /tmp/6987
> > make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0/ooo-build'
> > make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2
> > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
I know. But I don't get the build-deps installed on merulo so I can
try it myself....
It might have to do with the switch to openjdk, so also Ccing the
openjdk maintainer. But for the aformentioned reason I also can't verify
that by trying a build with java-gcj-compat-dev.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: