[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: caveat: GNOME 2.6 severly broken on Debian/unstable?

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:50:20PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> HJ, do you know of another scenario where a call to an undefined
> symbol would silently be ignored by ld.so?  (If you need more context,
> see the above bugreport URL).

After the maintainer looked at the bug he reverted a change that was
made with the patch


Basically the two things that were added were 

LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs
LDFLAGS += -Wl,-O1

Which raises the question are these flags sufficiently tested by the
binutils test suite?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: