Hello Justing et al,
Am Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 02:35:14PM -0300 schrieb Santiago Ruano Rincón:
> > Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > I've just pushed to the announcements repo these two drafts:
> > >
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/announcements/-/blob/master/en/2026/20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml?ref_type=heads
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/announcements/-/blob/master/en/2026/20260831-bullseye-lts-eol.wml?ref_type=heads
> > >
> > > to announce the handover of Debian 12 to LTS, and EOL of Debian 11 LTS.
> > >
> > > Could you please review them?
> >
> > Okay, inline commented diffs and attached revised versions:
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > > --- 20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml.orig 2026-07-05 05:25:44.414207560 +0100
> > > +++ 20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml 2026-07-05 06:51:34.412113413 +0100
> > > @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
> > >
> > > <p>
> > > On 12 June 2026, three years after the initial release, the regular
> >
> > (I'm standardising to this date format everywhere else, since it's the
> > format that styleguides generally recommend.)
>
> OK, thanks. But, when Debian has started using that date format? I
> still see the format that I used in the trixie release information:
> ("Debian 13.5 was released on May 16th, 2026. Debian 13.0 was initially
> released on August 9th, 2025.").
> https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/
> And used because of that. Any way, I'm happy to accept your change.
>
> For the future, is there any written guideline about formats (in
> general)?
I'm also interested, as I find the previous format "August 9th, 2025"
much nicer to read, but I'm of course not a native speaker and most
likely I will read the German version with its own styles …
Thanks!
Greetings
helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature