[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

pleiades 1.3.4~I20120531-dfsg-3: Please translate debconf PO for the package pleiades



(2nd version as the former one had a double space somewhere, thanks to Joe Dalton for pointing this)

Hi,

The debian-l10n-english team has reviewed the debconf templates for
pleiades. This opens an opportunity for new translations to be sent
for that package.

pleiades already includes translations for:
ja.po

so do not translate it to these languages (the previous translators will
be contacted separately).

language        translated     fuzzy     untranslated
-----------------------------------------------------
  ja                 0           1             2

Please send the updated file as a wishlist bug
against the package.


The deadline for receiving the updated translation is
Wednesday, July 04, 2012.

If you have read this far, please see the attached POT file.

Thanks,

# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
#
#, fuzzy
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: pleiades\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: pleiades@packages.debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-06-20 23:04+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
"Language: \n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../pleiades.templates:2001
msgid "Enable Pleiades in Eclipse configuration?"
msgstr ""

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../pleiades.templates:2001
msgid ""
"Eclipse is not currently configured to use Pleiades for Japanese language "
"support."
msgstr ""

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../pleiades.templates:2001
msgid ""
"Please choose whether Pleiades should be activated in the Eclipse "
"configuration file (/etc/eclipse.ini)."
msgstr ""

Reply to: