[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of screentest to fix pending l10n bugs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Giacomo,

Thanks a lot for your quick (and positive) answer.

Le 27/04/2012 09:08, Giacomo Catenazzi a écrit :

> Ok. I'm fine with a NMU (or alternatively I can do myself the upload).

I'm fine with both. If you prefer doing the upload yourself, I'll send
you a debdiff in about ten days (I just sent a call for new translation
with a ten-days deadline). It will be a pretty trivial one: just adding
the new PO file(s) and its (or their) name in configure{,.ac}.

> Note: the package is old (but simple), so it may not compile.

Without too much surprise (Lucas would have filled an FTBFS during one
of his many full archive rebuild), it builds fine on amd64. I have no
idea if it will go smoothly in all architecture though.

> No need to subscribe to the PTS, I'll read anyway the bugs, and I will
> contact you in the unlikely case that there are problem on translations.

Even better then, thanks.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=Fnwr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: