Intent to NMU pppconfig to fix pending po l10n bugs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 13/12/2011 13:12, Micah Gersten a écrit :
> Updating the .po files in the clean rule increases the diff for downstream distributions
> when regenerating a source package. Please consider doing that in a separate rule.
If no string have been changed in the manual pages, the po4a update [0]
won't change any file. If some string have changed, it's normal to
update the PO files, and to ask for translation update.
0: po4a --rm-translations man/po4a.cfg
> Thanks for considering the patch.
Please don't apply such patch, it would be a pity for keeping
translation up to date. I even note that this package has seen no update
from its maintainer in the last four years, and that the last three NMU
are about mostly localization (too bad there was no proper call for
translation update with the last one…).
John, would you mind if I coordinate a call for translation, so we can
fix the current translation status? If you don't reply within a week,
I'll post an NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you (maintainer)
CC'ed, and the actual call for translation update. This can happen
earlier if the maintainer agrees. Ten days latter, I'll prepare the NMU
(or better, will hand the the debdiff to the maintainer) and send upload
it to DELAYED/7-day. It will fix at least #654852 (Russian translation),
and probably many more translation update:
language translated fuzzy untranslated
- -----------------------------------------------------
ca 97 38 2
cs 135 2
da 97 38 2
de 137
el 97 38 2
es 97 38 2
eu 126 9 2
fi 97 38 2
fr 134 3
gl 126 9 2
he 134 3
id 126 9 2
it 97 38 2
ja 134 3
ko 97 38 2
lt 135 2
nb 97 38 2
nl 97 38 2
nn 97 38 2
pt 129 8
pt_BR 97 38 2
ro 126 9 2
ru 129 8
sk 135 2
sv 135 2
tl 126 9 2
tr 97 38 2
vi 126 9 2
zh_CN 97 38 2
zh_TW 97 38 2
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=LZAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: