[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of tex-common to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at):

> (Dutch translation) THat is already in tex-common 2.11~1 in our
> repository. I don't mind uploading that, but it will create
> a bit of havoc since suddenly we have mtxrun also running there.
> 
> Do you use what we have in the svn repository, or do you create your
> own package?

I'm using what's in the BTS which, I guess, is what you have in SVN.

> Honestly said, I don't want to upload any subsitantial changes to
> tex-common now, as I am crazy packaging TL2012 and a serious new
> version of tex-common v3 with many changes to the handling of
> the config files, which will also need a rebuild opf many packages.
> 
> THus, I propose that you go ahead with the NMU at any time.
> Consider this hereby a free ticket for any further NMU which regards
> only translation things. You don't even need to wait for 7 days or
> whatever, straight upload, as *I* will probably not upload
> anything new to unstable soon. Only


OK, will do so, after a small round of translation updates (that will
very probably bring 1 or 2 more translations).

Of course, all this is not urgent at all and I would also have
understood very well(given that tex-common is not a random package) if
you'd preferred no NMU and wait for even several weeks...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: