Re: Bug#645850: lxc package debconf templates
On 11/14/2011 06:52 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
This package was still using the former process because I
hadn't time yet to polish the process.
right, and that's now my fault?
I am annoyed because I handled a full translation update round that
required a significant amount of time from 8 translators of 8
different languages, without any kind of input from Daniel
to at least stop the process and tell us "guys, you're going the wrong way".
if the whole processes would be more maintainer friendly, "reviewers"
who are going "the wrong way" wouldn't slipp so easily.
This for a package with 41 strings, which is really significant.
no it's not.
you've just reviewed two things only, lxc/title and lxc/auto (the other
strings are 6 new ones in lxc for newly added debconf questions, and 31
new ones in the newly added linux-container package not present since).
that is a total of 4 strings you've reviewed and which were translated
subsequently. not more, not less.
i'd appreciate if you at least keep facts straight.
I am annoyed because lintian warns about all that and, still, the
upload happened.
why not? l10n can always synched anytimes, that doesn't justify a
hold-up of important package updates.
I am annoyed because the only answer I got was today's answer
basically saying that our review was crap.
ftr, those were not my words (i do tend to watch my language).
however, you know what's really annoying? *you* screw up, i didn't see
it in time, *you* blame me for *your* faults. please, grow up..
So, as annoyed as I am, I will certainly *not* do anything more on
this package. Period.
closing bug then, thanks.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Reply to: