[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: i18n.debian.net being upgraded to squeeze



Quoting Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@gmail.com):
> On 29 May 2011 07:29, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> >> ddtp.debian.net seems to have a problem with the login.
> >> Clicking on "Login" at http://ddtp.debian.net/ddtss/index.cgi/de gives
> >> following error:
> >> "The requested URL /ddtss/index.cgi/login was not found on this server."
> >
> > Indeed. I didn't notice because I'm logged in, in my browser.
> >
> > Martijn, could you have a look?
> 
> Looks like the HTTPS server is not configured. It needs to point to
> the same directory as the HTTP.
> 
> Someone with admin rights will need to look at that.

Probably related to the following when starting apache:

churro:/etc/apache2# /etc/init.d/apache2 start
Starting web server: apache2[Sun May 29 14:49:21 2011] [warn] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence
[Sun May 29 14:49:21 2011] [warn] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence
.

Problem: the "_default_" VirtualHost is only defined in
/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl but these settings are NOT
linked from anything in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled:

churro:/etc/apache2# ls -l sites-available/
total 24
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1565 Nov 27  2008 ddtp.debian.net
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  950 Mar 22 21:56 default
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7469 Mar 22 21:56 default-ssl
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2785 Jul 22  2009 i18n.debian.net
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1602 Nov 27  2008 pootle.debian.net
churro:/etc/apache2# ls -l sites-enabled   
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 Nov 27  2008 000-i18n.debian.net -> /etc/apache2/sites-available/i18n.debian.net
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 Nov 27  2008 ddtp.debian.net -> /etc/apache2/sites-available/ddtp.debian.net
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Nov 27  2008 pootle.debian.net -> /etc/apache2/sites-available/pootle.debian.net
ch

/me puzzled.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: