Re: xz-utils: Typos in Hungarian package description
Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
> Shouldn't 608900 be reassigned to debian-i18n and closed as the
> description is fixed now? To be precise: closed means marked as done.
I closed it when the change hit the mirrors (I only marked it
"pending" when it was fixed in DDTSS/DDTP because I've learned to be
skeptical of the relevant infrastructure in the past).
> As far as I understand the process of translating package descriptions,
> the maintainer is somehow "less responsible" for what's happening out
> there in DDTSS/DDTP as description translations are not part of his package.
Ah, I hadn't known about the debian-i18n package! Thanks for a
pointer.
Since the bug is already closed, I'm leaving it alone. :)
Reply to: